File Name: the rationalists descartes spinoza and leibniz .zip
- 17th Century Theories of Substance
- The Rationalists
- The Rationalists: Between Tradition and Innovation
17th Century Theories of Substance
Most users should sign in with their email address. If you originally registered with a username please use that to sign in. To purchase short term access, please sign in to your Oxford Academic account above. Don't already have an Oxford Academic account? Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.
Sign in Create an account. Syntax Advanced Search. The Rationalists. John Cottingham. Oxford University Press
For 17 th century philosophers, the term is reserved for the ultimate constituents of reality on which everything else depends. This article discusses the most important theories of substance from the 17 th century: those of Descartes , Spinoza , and Leibniz. Although these philosophers were highly original thinkers, they shared a basic conception of substance inherited from the scholastic-Aristotelian tradition from which philosophical thinking was emerging. In a general sense each of these theories is a way of working out dual commitments: a commitment to substance as an ultimate subject and a commitment to the existence of God as a substance. In spite of these systematic similarities between the theories, they ultimately offer very different accounts of the nature of substance. Given the foundational role that substance plays in the metaphysical schemes of these thinkers, it will not be surprising to find that these theories of substance underlie dramatically different accounts of the nature and structure of reality.
Please contact mpub-help umich. For more information, read Michigan Publishing's access and usage policy. The essay concludes with an historically-minded suggestion for those eager to revitalize the once-again popular notion of grounding. Thought through carefully, however, that demand, Della Rocca argues, shows that the PSR is inconsistent with any plurality whatsoever. And the same holds for us. Would-be contemporary rationalists must similarly abandon the Principle of Sufficient Reason or embrace a thoroughgoing monism. So, for example, it has been maintained that the fact that a ball is red-and-round might be grounded in the fact that it is red and the fact that it is round.
Rationalism, or a belief that we come to knowledge through the use of logic, and thus independently of sensory experience, was critical to the debates of the Enlightenment period, when most philosophers lauded the power of reason but insisted that knowledge comes from experience. Rationalism—as an appeal to human reason as a way of obtaining knowledge—has a philosophical history dating from antiquity. While rationalism, as the view that reason is the main source of knowledge, did not dominate the Enlightenment, it laid critical basis for the debates that developed over the course of the 18th century. Descartes was the first of the modern rationalists. He thought that only knowledge of eternal truths including the truths of mathematics and the foundations of the sciences could be attained by reason alone, while the knowledge of physics required experience of the world, aided by the scientific method. Leibniz, Spinoza, and Descartes were all well-versed in mathematics, as well as philosophy, and Descartes and Leibniz contributed greatly to science as well.
The Rationalists: Between Tradition and Innovation
This book introduces student to the three major figures of modern philosophy known as the rationalists. It is not for complete beginners, but it is an accessible account of their thought. By concerning itself with metaphysics, and in particular substance, the book relates an important historical debate largely neglected by the contemporary debates in the once again popular area of traditional metaphysics. Do Not USE. Sign up to our newsletter and receive discounts and inspiration for your next reading experience.
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz — German rationalist philosopher, mathematician, and logician. John Locke — philosopher. Any philosophy magnifying the role played by unaided reason, in the acquisition and justification of knowledge.
Для того и предназначен этот переключатель, верно. Мидж покачала головой. - Только если файл не заражен вирусом.